Paper detail

Evoking realistic affective touch experiences in virtual reality

This study aims to better understand the emotional and physiological correlates of being caressed in VR depending on the type of multisensory feedback provided and the animate or inanimate nature of the virtual representation that touches an embodied virtual body. We evaluated how pleasure, arousal, embodiment, and the illusion of being touched in VR were influenced by the inclusion of only visual feedback compared to visuotactile stimulation conditions, where participants, in addition to seeing an avatar or feather caressing their virtual bodies, also perceived congruent mid-air ultrasonic tactile stimulation or real interpersonal touch. We found that visuotactile feedback, either based on ultrasound or real interpersonal touch, boosts the illusion of being affectively touched and embodied in a virtual body compared to conditions only based on visual feedback. However, real interpersonal touch led to the strongest behavioral and emotional responses compared to the other conditions. Moreover, arousal and the desire to withdraw the caressed hand was highest when being touched by a female avatar compared to a virtual feather. Female participants reported a stronger illusion of being caressed in VR compared to males. Overall, this study advances knowledge of the emotional and physiological impact of affective touch in VR.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.