Paper detail

Evidence that most type 1 AGN are reddened by dust in the host ISM

The typical optical-UV continuum slopes observed in many type 1 AGN are redder than expected from thin accretion disk models. A possible resolution to this conundrum is that many AGN are reddened by dust along the line of sight. To explore this possibility, we stack 5000 SDSS AGN with luminosity L~10^45erg/s and redshift z~0.4 in bins of optical continuum slope alpha_opt and width of the broad H$β$ emission line. We measure the EW of the NaID absorption feature in each stacked spectrum. We find a linear relation between alpha_opt and EW(NaID), such that EW(NaID) increases as alpha_opt becomes redder. In the bin with the smallest H$β$ width, objects with the bluest slopes that are similar to accretion disk predictions are found to have EW(NaID)=0, supporting the line-of-sight dust hypothesis. This conclusion is also supported by the dependence of the $Hα/Hβ$ line ratio on alpha_opt. The implied relationship between alpha_opt and dust reddening is given by E(B-V)~0.2(-0.1-alpha_opt), and the implied reddening of a typical type 1 AGN with alpha_opt=-0.5 is E(B-V)~0.08mag. Photoionization calculations show that the dusty gas responsible for reddening is too ionized to produce the observed features. Therefore, we argue that the sodium absorption arises in regions of the host ISM which are shielded from the AGN radiation, and the correlation with alpha_opt arises since ISM columns along shielded and non-shielded sightlines are correlated. This scenario is supported by the similarity of the E(B-V)-NaID relation implied by our results with the relation in the Milky-Way found by previous studies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.