Paper detail

Evidence That Gamma-Ray Burst Sources Repeat

We investigate clustering in the angular distribution of the 260 $γ$-ray bursts in the publicly available BATSE catalogue, using a nearest neighbour analysis and the measures of burst brightness $B$ and short time scale variability $V$ which we introduced earlier. We find that while all 260 bursts are only modestly clustered (Q-value = $1.8 \times 10^{-2}$), the 202 bursts in this sample for which the statistical error in their locations is $<9^\circ$ are significantly clustered on an angular scale $\approx 5^\circ$ (Q-value = $2.5 \times 10^{-4}$, taking into acoount having chosen the cutoff in the statistical error). We also find a significant correlation between bright type I bursts and faint type I and type II bursts on an angular scale $\approx 5^\circ$ (Q-value = $4.0 \times 10^{-3}$). This angular scale is smaller than the typical (statistical plus systematic) error in burst locations of $6.8^\circ$, suggesting multiple recurrences from individual sources. We conclude that ``classical&#39;&#39; $γ$-ray burst sources repeat on a time scale of months, and that many faint type I and II bursts come from the sources of bright type I bursts.

preprint1993arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.