Paper detail

Evidence of the mixed phase formation in nucleus-nucleus collisions

Searchers for various irregularities in the behavior of thermodynamic quantities at chemical freeze-out (CFO) are rather important in a view of experimental studies of quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Using the multicomponent hadron resonance gas model (HRGM), developed in (Sagun, 2014; Bugaev et al., 2015), we performed a high-quality fit of 111 hadronic ratios measured for 14 values of the center of mass collision energies between 2.7 GeV and 200 GeV with the overall fit quality $χ^2/dof \simeq 0.95$. In addition to previously reported singularities (Bugaev et al., 2015) at CFO we found that the hadron yield ratios $\fracΛ{p}$, $\frac{K^{+}}{p}$, $\frac{K^{+}}Λ$, $\frac{Ω^{-}}{p}$ and $\frac{Ξ^{-}}{p}$ measured in central nuclear collisions demonstrate a significant change of slope in the same range of center of mass collision energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 4.3-4.9$ GeV (Bugaev et al., 2015). This change of slopes is accompanied by a dramatic increase of resonance decays at CFO. Also at CFO the trace anomaly and baryonic density demonstrate the pronounced peaks at the collision energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 4.9 $ GeV. We argue that all these and previously found irregularities provide an evidence for the QGP formation in nuclear collisions at about $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 4.9 $ GeV.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.