Paper detail

Evidence for the White Dwarf Nature of Mira B

The nature of the accreting companion to Mira --- the prototypical pulsating asymptotic giant branch star --- has been a matter of debate for more than 25 years. Here we use a quantitative analysis of the rapid optical brightness variations from this companion, Mira B, which we observed with the Nickel telescope at Lick Observatory, to show that it is a white dwarf (WD). The amplitude of aperiodic optical variations on time scales of minutes to tens of minutes (approximately 0.2 mag) is consistent with that of accreting WDs in cataclysmic variables on these same time scales. It is significantly greater than that expected from an accreting main-sequence star. With Mira B identified as a WD, its ultraviolet (UV) and optical luminosities, along with constraints on the WD effective temperature from the UV, indicate that it accretes at ~1e-10 solar masses per year. We do not find any evidence that the accretion rate is higher than predicted by Bondi-Hoyle theory. The accretion rate is high enough, however, to explain the weak X-ray emission, since the accretion-disk boundary layer around a low-mass WD accreting at this rate is likely to be optically thick and therefore to emit primarily in the far or extreme UV. Furthermore, the finding that Mira B is a WD means that it has experienced, and will continue to experience nova explosions, roughly every million years. It also highlights the similarity between Mira AB and other jet-producing symbiotic binaries such as R Aquarii, CH Cygni, and MWC 560, and therefore raises the possibility that Mira B launched the recently discovered bipolar streams from this system.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.