Paper detail

Evidence for the Galactic Origin of Gamma-Ray Bursts

We investigate the angular distribution of the $γ$-ray bursts in the publicly available BATSE catalogue, using the measures of burst brightness $B$ and short time scale ($\simless$ 0.3 s) variability $V$ which we introduced earlier. We show that the 54 type I ($\log V \le -0.8$) bursts lying in the middle brightness range 490 counts $\le B \le$ 1250 counts (corresponding to 1/3 of all type I bursts) exhibit a Galactic dipole moment of $\langle \cos θ\rangle = 0.204 \pm 0.079$ {\it and} a deviation of the Galactic quadrupole moment from 1/3 of $\langle \sin^2 b \rangle - 1/3 = -0.104 \pm 0.041$. Using Monte Carlo simulations which include the BATSE sky exposure map and taking into account division of the type I bursts into three equal samples, we find that the probability by chance of an isotropic distribution of 54 bursts exhibiting values of $\langle \cos θ\rangle$ {\it and} the negative of $\langle \sin^2 b \rangle - 1/3$ which equal or exceed the observed values is $6.6 \times 10^{-5}$. We conclude that $γ$-ray bursts are Galactic in origin.

preprint1993arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.