Paper detail

Evidence for Non-smooth Quenching in Massive Galaxies at $z\sim1$

We investigate a large sample of massive galaxies at $z\sim1$ with combined $HST$ broad-band and grism observations to constrain the star-formation histories of these systems as they transition from a star-forming state to quiescence. Among our sample of massive $(M_*>10^{10}~{\rm M_\odot})$ galaxies at $0.7<z<1.2$, dust-corrected H$α$ and UV star-formation indicators agree with a small dispersion ($\sim0.2$~dex) for galaxies on the main sequence, but diverge and exhibit substantial scatter ($\sim0.7$~dex) once they drop significantly below the star-forming main sequence. Significant H$α$ emission is present in galaxies with low dust-corrected UV SFR values as well as galaxies classified as quiescent using the $UVJ$ diagram. We compare the observed H$α$ flux distribution to the expected distribution assuming bursty or smooth star-formation histories, and find that massive galaxies at $z\sim1$ are most consistent with a quick, bursty quenching process. This suggests that mechanisms such as feedback, stochastic gas flows, and minor mergers continue to induce low-level bursty star formation in massive galaxies at moderate redshift, even as they quench.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.