Paper detail

Evidence for non-evolving FeII/MgII ratios in rapidly accreting z~6 QSOs

[abridged] Quasars (QSOs) at the highest known redshift (z~6) are unique probes of the early growth of supermassive black holes (BHs). Until now, only the most luminous QSOs have been studied, often one object at a time. Here we present the most extensive consistent analysis to date of z>4 QSOs with observed NIR spectra, combining three new z~6 objects from our ongoing VLT-ISAAC program with nineteen 4<z<6.5 sources from the literature. The new sources extend the existing SDSS sample towards the faint end of the QSO luminosity function. Using a maximum likelihood fitting routine optimized for our spectral decomposition, we estimate the black hole mass (MBH), the Eddington ratio (defined as Lbol/LEdd) and the FeII/MgII line ratio, a proxy for the chemical abundance, to characterize both the central object and the broad line region gas. The QSOs in our sample host BHs with masses of ~10^9 M\odot that are accreting close to the Eddington luminosity, consistent with earlier results. We find that the distribution of observed Eddington ratios is significantly different than that of a luminosity-matched comparison sample of SDSS QSOs at lower redshift (0.35<z<2.25): the average <log(Lbol/LEdd)>=-0.37 (Lbol/LEdd~0.43) with a scatter of 0.20 dex for the z>4 sample and the <log(Lbol/LEdd)>=-0.80 (Lbol/LEdd~0.16) with a scatter of 0.24 dex for the 0.35<z<2.25 sample. This implies that, at a given luminosity, the MBH at high-z is typically lower than the average MBH of the lower-redshift population, i.e. the z>4 sources are accreting significantly faster than the lower-redshift ones. We show that the derived FeII/MgII ratios depend sensitively on the performed analysis: our self-consistent, homogeneous analysis significantly reduces the FeII/MgII scatter found in previous studies. The measured FeII/MgII line ratios show no sign of evolution with cosmic time in the redshift range 4<z<6.5 [...]

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.