Paper detail

Evidence for Near-Equatorial Deposition by Energetic Electrons in the Ionospheric F-layer

Near-equatorial great enhancements of the quasi-trapped >30 keV electrons at low-altitudes are studied during strong geomagnetic storms. We have found that the transient phenomenon often began at the morning and was capable to live several hours predominantly over the Pacific region with flux intensities largely exceeded quiet-time level by 4-5 orders of magnitudes. The purpose of the study is to validate an assumption that the enhanced quasi-trapped electron fluxes can be an important source of the ionization in the topside ionosphere in the range between the low and middle latitudes and to estimate energy deposition. We show that ionizing particle effect can significantly contribute in storm-time increase of total electron content (TEC) or positive ionospheric storm. We present analysis of medium/great flux events during moderate/major storms on 22 July 2009 and 27 July 2004 as examples for demonstrating concomitances of enhanced electron fluxes with ionospheric storm positive phases. Addition experimental support concerning the F2-region rise was obtained from COSMIC/FS3 radio occultation data for the storm of 22 July 2009.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.