Paper detail

Evidence for multiple populations in the massive globular cluster NGC 2419 from deep uVI LBT photometry

We present accurate wide-field uVI photometry of the remote and massive Galactic globular cluster NGC 2419, aimed at searching for the u-V color spread along the Red Giant Branch (RGB) that is generally interpreted as the photometric signature of the presence of multiple populations in globular clusters. Focusing on the RGB stars in the magnitude range 19.8<V<22.0, we find that (a) the u-V, u-I and the V-I spreads about the RGB ridge line are significantly larger than that expected from observational errors, accurately quantified by means of extensive artificial stars experiments, (b) the intrinsic color spread in u-V and u-I are larger than in V-I, (c) the stars lying to the blue of the RGB ridge line in u-V and u-I are significantly more concentrated toward the cluster center than those lying to the red of that line. All the above observational facts can be interpreted in a scenario where a sizable fraction of cluster stars belong to a second generation heavily enriched in Helium. Finally we find that bright RGB stars (17.5<V<19.0) having [Mg/Fe]<0.0 lie preferentially on the red side of the cluster RGB, while those having [Mg/Fe]>0.0 lie preferentially on the blue side.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.