Paper detail

Evidence for GeV Pair Halos around Low Redshift Blazars

We report on the results of a search for $γ$-ray pair halos with a stacking analysis of low-redshift blazars using data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope. For this analysis we used a number of a-priori selection criteria, including the spatial and spectral properties of the Fermi sources. The angular distribution of $\sim$ 1GeV photons around 24 stacked isolated high-synchrotron-peaked BL Lacs with redshift $z<0.5$ shows an excess over that of point-like sources. A statistical analysis yields a Bayes factor of $\mathrm{log}_{10}B_{10}>2$, providing evidence in favor of extended emission against the point-source hypothesis, consistent with expectations for pair halos produced in the IGMF with strength $B_{\mathrm{IGMF}}\sim 10^{-17}-10^{-15}\mathrm{G}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.