Paper detail

Evidence for enhanced chromospheric Ca II H & K emission in stars with close-in extrasolar planets

The planet-star interaction is manifested in many ways. It was found out that a close-in exoplanet causes small but measurable variability in the cores of a few lines in the spectra of several stars which corresponds to the orbital period of the exoplanet. Stars with and without exoplanets may have different properties. The main goal of our study is to search for influence which exoplanets might have on atmospheres of their host stars. Unlike the previous studies, we do not study changes in the spectrum of a host star or differences between stars with and without exoplanets. We aim to study a large number of stars with exoplanets, current level of their chromospheric activity and look for a possible correlation with the exoplanetary properties. To analyse the chromospheric activity of stars we exploit our own (2.2m ESO/MPG telescope) and publicly available archival spectra (Keck Observatory Archive), measure the equivalent widths of the cores of Ca II H and K lines and use them as a tracer of their activity. Subsequently, we search for their dependence on the orbital parameters and mass of the exoplanet. We found a statistically significant evidence that the equivalent width of the Ca II K line emission and log R'_{HK} activity parameter of the host star varies with the semi-major axis and mass of the exoplanet. Stars with T_eff <= 5500 K having exoplanets with semi-major axis a <= 0.15 AU (P_orb <= 20 days) have a broad range of Ca II K emissions and much stronger emission in general than stars at similar temperatures but with higher values of semi-major axes. Ca II K emission of cold stars (T_eff <= 5500 K) with close-in exoplanets (a <= 0.15 AU) is also more pronounced for more massive exoplanets. The overall level of the chromospheric activity of stars may be affected by their close-in exoplanets. Stars with massive close-in exoplanets may be more active.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.