Paper detail

Evidence for early disk-locking among low-mass members of the Orion Nebula Cluster

We present high-resolution spectroscopic observations for 91 PMS stars in ONC with masses in the range 0.10-0.25Msun carried out with the multi-fiber spectrograph FLAMES@ESO. Our aim is to better understand the disk-locking scenario in very low-mass stars. We have derived radial velocities, vsini, and full width at 10% of the Halpha emission peak. Using published measurements of infrared excess as disk tracer, and equivalent width of the NIR CaII line lambda8542, mid-IR difference [3.6]-[8.0]micron derived by Spitzer data, and 10% Halpha width as diagnostic of the level of accretion, we have looked for any correlation between vsini divided by the radius and presence of disk and accretion. Four low-mass stars are SB2 systems. The distribution of rotation periods derived from our vsini measurements is unimodal with a peak of few days. Our <sini> is lower than the one expected for a random distribution. We find no evidence for a population of fast rotators close to the break-up velocity. A clear correlation between vsini/R and Delta(Ic-K) has been found. While for stars with no circumstellar disk a spread in the rotation rates is seen, stars with a circumstellar disk show an abrupt drop in their rotation rates by a factor of ~5. On the other hand, only a partial correlation between vsini and accretion is observed when other indicators are used. The X-ray coronal activity level shows no dependence on vsini/R suggesting that all stars are in a saturated regime limit. The critical velocity is probably below our vsini detection limit of 9 km/s. The ONC low-mass stars in our sample at present seem to be not locked, but the clear correlation we find between rotation and IR color excess suggests that they were locked once. In addition, the percentage of accretors seems to scale inversely to the stellar mass.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.