Paper detail

Evidence for a second component in the high-energy core emission from Centaurus A?

We report on an analysis of \fermi data from four year of observations of the nearby radio galaxy Centaurus A (Cen A). The increased photon statistics results in a detection of high-energy ($>\:100$ MeV) $γ$-rays up to 50 GeV from the core of Cen A, with a detection significance of about 44$σ$. The average gamma-ray spectrum of the core reveals evidence for a possible deviation from a simple power-law. A likelihood analysis with a broken power-law model shows that the photon index becomes harder above $E_b \simeq 4$ GeV, changing from $Γ_1=2.74\pm0.03$ below to $Γ_2=2.09\pm0.20$ above. This hardening could be caused by the contribution of an additional high-energy component beyond the common synchrotron-self Compton jet emission. A variability analysis of the light curve with 15-, 30-, and 60-day bins does not provide evidence for variability for any of the components. Indications for a possible variability of the observed flux are found on 45-day time scale, but the statistics do not allow us to make a definite conclusion in this regards. We compare our results with the spectrum reported by H.E.S.S. in the TeV energy range and discuss possible origins for the hardening observed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.