Paper detail

Evidence for a Pseudogap Above the Critical Temperature in the Attractive Hubbard Model

We explore the effect of fluctuations for $T \geq T_c$ in the 2-D negative Hubbard model within the framework of the selfconsistent T-matrix formalism, which goes beyond the BCS approximation and includes pair fluctuations. We enter the regime where correlations are important, namely, $U/t = -4.0$, where $t$ denotes the hopping matrix element between nearest neighboors and $U$ is the strength of the on-site interaction. Our results include: 1) In comparison to the free case, the distribution function, $n({\bf k})$, reveals considerable renormalization. This fact makes us conclude that the Fermi surface is blurred for correlated electron systems; 2) There is a pseudogap in the density of states, $N(ω)$, around the chemical potential, $μ$; and 3) The real part of the T-matrix, at zero frequency and zero momentum, vs $T/t$ shows a divergence at a particular temperature. This last result shows that more approximate T-matrix calculations, extended to $T~=~0$ are meaningless.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.