Paper detail

Evidence for a proto-black hole and a double astrophysical component in GRB 101023

[Shortened] Context: [...] we point out a striking similarity between GRB 101023 and GRB 090618. We explore the possibility that these sources are members of a new GRB family related to a single core-collapse. We use this understanding of the source in order to infer the unobserved redshift of GRB 101023. [...]. Aims: In precise analogy with GRB 090618 we aim to analyze the 89s of emission of GRB 101023 to see if we are in presence of two different episodes: the first one presenting a characteristic Black-body temperature evolution, evolving in time with a broken power-law, and the second one consistent with a canonical GRB. [...] Results: We confirm that the first episode can be well fit by a Black body plus a power-law model. The temperature changes with time following a broken power law, and the photon index of the power-law component presents a soft to hard evolution. We estimate the radius of this source, increasing with time with a velocity of 1.5x10^4 km/s. The second episode appears to be a canonical GRB. By using the Amati relation and the Atteia relation, we determine the cosmological redshift, z ~ 0.9 +- 0.084 (stat.) +- 0.2 (sys.). [...]. Particularly striking is the scaling law of the soft X-ray component of the afterglow. Conclusions: We identify GRB 090618 and GRB 101023 with a new family of GRBs presenting a double astrophysical component. A first one, related to the proto-black hole, prior to the process of gravitational collapse (episode 1) and a second one which is the canonical GRB (episode 2) emitted during the formation of the black-hole. [...] This analysis indicates progress towards developing a GRB distance indicator based on the understanding of the P-GRB and the prompt radiation as well as the soft X-Ray behavior of the late afterglow.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.