Paper detail

Evidence for a non-universal stellar initial mass function from the integrated properties of SDSS galaxies

This paper revisits the classical Kennicutt method for inferring the stellar initial mass function (IMF) from the integrated light properties of galaxies. The large size, uniform high quality data set from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR4 is combined with more in depth modeling and quantitative statistical analysis to search for systematic IMF variations as a function of galaxy luminosity. Galaxy H alpha equivalent widths are compared to a broadband color index to constrain the IMF. This parameter space is useful for breaking degeneracies which are traditionally problematic. Age and dust corrections are largely orthogonal to IMF variations. In addition the effects of metallicity and smooth star formation history e-folding times are small compared to IMF variations. We find that for the sample as a whole the best fitting IMF slope above 0.5 M_sun is Gamma = 1.4535 with a negligible random error of +/- 0.0004 and a systematic error of +/- 0.1. Galaxies brighter than around M_r,0.1 = -20 (including galaxies like the Milky Way which has M_r,0.1 ~ -21) are well fit by a universal Gamma ~ 1.4 IMF, similar to Salpeter, and smooth, exponential star formation histories (SFH). Fainter galaxies prefer steeper IMFs and the quality of the fits reveal that for these galaxies a universal IMF with smooth SFHs is actually a poor assumption. Several sources of sample bias are ruled out as the cause of these luminosity dependent IMF variations. Analysis of bursting SFH models shows that an implausible coordination of burst times is required to fit a universal IMF to the M_r,0.1 = -17 galaxies. This leads to the conclusions that the IMF in low luminosity galaxies has fewer massive stars, either by steeper slope or lower upper mass cutoff, and is not universal.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.