Paper detail

Evidence for a non-universal Kennicutt-Schmidt relationship using hierarchical Bayesian linear regression

For investigating the relationship between the star formation rate and gas surface density, we develop a Bayesian linear regression method that rigorously treats measurement uncertainties and accounts for hierarchical data structure. The hierarchical method simultaneously estimates the intercept, slope, and scatter about the regression line of each individual subject and the population. Using synthetic datasets, we demonstrate that the method recovers the underlying parameters of both the individuals and the population, especially when compared to commonly employed ordinary least squares techniques, such as the bisector fit. We apply the hierarchical method to estimate the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) parameters of a sample of spiral galaxies compiled by Bigiel et al. (2008). We find significant variation in the KS parameters, indicating that no single relationship holds for all galaxies. This suggests that the relationship between molecular gas and star formation differs between galaxies, possibly due to the influence of other properties within a given galaxy, such as metallicity, molecular gas fraction, or stellar mass. In four galaxies the slope estimates are sub-linear (at the 95% level). We estimate the mean index of the KS relationship for the population to be 0.84, with 95% range [0.63, 1.0]. For the galaxies with sub-linear KS relationships, a possible interpretation is that CO emission is tracing some molecular gas that is not directly associated with star formation. Equivalently, a sub-linear KS relationship may be indicative of an increasing gas depletion time at higher surface densities, as traced by CO emission. The Bayesian method can account for all sources of uncertainties, including variations in the conversion of observed intensities to star formation rates and gas surface densities, and is therefore well suited for a thorough statistical analysis of the KS law.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.