Paper detail

Evidence for a magnetic neutron star in high mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54 with INTEGRAL/IBIS observations

The hard X-ray source 4U 2206+54 is a peculiar high mass X-ray binary with a main-sequence donor star. Recent X-ray observations suggested that the compact object in 4U 2206+54 may be a neutron star. The X-ray emission comes from the accretion of stellar winds from the massive donor stars, and variability of luminosity may be due to the changes of its orbit phase. To further reveal the nature of compact object, we studied 4U 2206+54 with INTEGRAL/IBIS observations in two years, and found that in most time, 4U 2206+54 undergone a quiescent state and sometime an active state. In the quiescent state the spectrum can be fitted by a power-law model of $Γ\sim 2.1$ with a hard X-ray luminosity of $\sim 5\times 10^{34}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (20-- 100 keV). While in the active state, the 20-- 100 keV hard X-ray luminosity reaches $\sim 2\times 10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and the spectrum is fitted by a thermal bremmstrahlung model of $kT\sim 43$ keV plus two cyclotron absorption lines at $\sim$ 30 and 60 keV. Then we derived a magnetic field of 3.3$\times 10^{12}$ G for the compact object in 4U 2206+54. During the active state, we found a pulsation period of $\sim$ 5400 s in the light curve of 4U 2206+54. So the compact object in 4U 2206+54 should be a magnetic neutron star with a slow pulsation. Cyclotron absorption lines detected in the active state and non-detection in the quiescent state suggested that two different accretion states have possible different hard X-ray emission regions: surface of neutron star in the active state; the magnetic-accretion pressure equivalent point in the quiescent state. The re-analysis of the RXTE/ASM light curve found the modulation periods at $\sim 9.56$ days and 19.11 days, and the orbit period of 4U 2206+54 should be 19.11 days.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.