Paper detail

Evidence for a high mutual inclination between the cold Jupiter and transiting super Earth orbiting $π$ Men

$π$ Men hosts a transiting super Earth ($P\approx6.27$ d, $m\approx4.82$ $M_{\oplus}$, $R\approx2.04$ $R_{\oplus}$) discovered by TESS and a cold Jupiter ($P\approx2093$ d, $m \sin I\approx10.02$ $M_{\rm{Jup}}$, $e\approx0.64$) discovered from radial velocity. We use Gaia DR2 and Hipparcos astrometry to derive the star&#39;s velocity caused by the orbiting planets and constrain the cold Jupiter&#39;s sky-projected inclination ($I_b=41-65^{\circ}$). From this we derive the mutual inclination ($ΔI$) between the two planets, and find that $49^{\circ}< ΔI < 131^{\circ}$ (1$σ$), and $28^{\circ} < ΔI < 152^{\circ}$ (2$σ$). We examine the dynamics of the system using $N$-body simulations, and find that potentially large oscillations in the super Earth&#39;s eccentricity and inclination are suppressed by general relativistic precession. However, nodal precession of the inner orbit around the invariable plane causes the super Earth to only transit between 7-22 per cent of the time, and to usually be observed as misaligned with the stellar spin axis. We repeat our analysis for HAT-P-11, finding a large $ΔI$ between its close-in Neptune and cold Jupiter and similar dynamics. $π$ Men and HAT-P-11 are prime examples of systems where dynamically hot outer planets excite their inner planets, with the effects of increasing planet eccentricities, planet-star misalignments, and potentially reducing the transit multiplicity. Formation of such systems likely involves scattering between multiple giant planets or misaligned protoplanetary discs. Future imaging of the faint debris disc in $π$ Men and precise constraints on the stellar spin orientation would provide strong tests for these formation scenarios.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.