Paper detail

Evidence Against a Redshift z>6 for the Galaxy STIS 123627+621755

The identification of galaxies at extreme distances provides our most direct information on the earliest phases of galaxy formation. The distance implied by redshifts z > 5 makes this a challenging endeavor for even the most luminous sources; interpretation of low signal-to-noise ratio observations of faint galaxies is difficult and occasional misidentifications will occur. Here we report on STIS 123627+621755, a galaxy with a suggested spectroscopic redshift of z = 6.68 and the most distant spectroscopically-identified object claimed. For the suggested redshift and reported spectral energy distribution, the galaxy should be essentially invisible shortward of 9300 Angstroms because the intervening intergalactic medium absorbs essentially all light energetic enough to ionize neutral hydrogen (lambda < (1 + z) x 912 Angstroms; the redshifted Lyman limit). The galaxy should be relatively bright in the near-infrared with f(nu) ~ 1 microJy. Here we report a detection of the galaxy at 6700 Angstroms, below the Lyman limit for z = 6.68. We also report a non-detection at 1.2 microns, implying the flux has dropped by a factor of three or more between rest 1216 Angstroms and rest 1560 Angstroms for z = 6.68. Our observations are inconsistent with the suggested extreme distance of STIS 123627+621755 and conservatively require z < 6.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.