Paper detail

Every-user delay guarantee for wireless multiple access systems

The quality of service (QoS) requirements are usually different from user to user in a multiaccess system, and it is necessary to take the different requirements into account when allocating the shared resources of the system. In this paper, we consider one QoS criterion--delay in a multiaccess system, and we combine information theory and queueing theory in an attempt to analyze whether a multiaccess system can meet the different delay requirements of users. For users with the same transmission power, we prove that only $N$ inequalities are necessary for the checking, and for users with different transmission powers, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for such a decision. In cases where the system cannot satisfy the delay requirements of all users, we prove that as long as the sum power is larger than a threshold, there is always an approach to adjust the transmission power of each user to make the system delay feasible if power reallocation is available.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.