Paper detail

Event-by-event distribution of magnetic field energy over initial fluid energy density in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 200 GeV Au-Au collisions

We estimate the event-by-event (e-by-e) distribution of the ratio ($σ$) of the magnetic field energy to the fluid energy density in the transverse plane of Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 200 GeV. A Monte-Carlo (MC) Glauber model is used to calculate the $σ$ in the transverse plane for impact parameter b=0, 12 fm at time $τ_i\sim$0.5 fm. The fluid energy density is obtained by using Gaussian smoothing with two different smoothing parameter $σ_g$=0.25 , 0.5 fm. For $b=0~\rm fm$ collisions $σ$ is found to be $\ll$ 1 in the central region of the fireball and $σ\gtrsim$ 1 at the periphery. For b=12 fm collisions $σ\gtrsim$ 1. The e-by-e correlation between $σ$ and the fluid energy density ($\varepsilon$) is studied. We did not find strong correlation between $σ$ and $\varepsilon$ at the centre of the fireball, whereas they are mostly anti-correlated at the periphery of the fireball.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.