Paper detail

Even maps, the Colin de~Verdière number and representations of graphs

Van der Holst and Pendavingh introduced a graph parameter $σ$, which coincides with the more famous Colin de Verdière graph parameter $μ$ for small values. However, the definition of $σ$ is much more geometric/topological directly reflecting embeddability properties of the graph. They proved $μ(G) \leq σ(G) + 2$ and conjectured $μ(G) \leq σ(G)$ for any graph $G$. We confirm this conjecture. As far as we know, this is the first topological upper bound on $μ(G)$ which is, in general, tight. Equality between $μ$ and $σ$ does not hold in general as van der Holst and Pendavingh showed that there is a graph $G$ with $μ(G) \leq 18$ and $σ(G)\geq 20$. We show that the gap appears on much smaller values, namely, we exhibit a graph $H$ for which $μ(H)\leq 7$ and $σ(H)\geq 8$. We also prove that, in general, the gap can be large: The incidence graphs $H_q$ of finite projective planes of order $q$ satisfy $μ(H_q) \in O(q^{3/2})$ and $σ(H_q) \geq q^2$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.