Paper detail

Evaporation of volatile droplets subjected to flame-like conditions

This work assesses Lagrangian droplet evaporation models frequently used in spray combustion simulations, with the purpose of identifying the influence of modeling decisions on the single droplet behavior. Besides more simplistic models, the evaluated strategies include a simple method to incorporate Stefan flow effects in the heat transfer (Bird's correction), a method to consider the interaction of Stefan flow with the heat and mass transfer films (Abramzon-Sirignano model), and a method to incorporate non-equilibrium thermodynamics (Langmuir-Knudsen model). The importance of each phenomena is quantified analytically and numerically under various conditions. Evaporation models ignoring Stefan flow are found to be invalid under the studied conditions. The Langmuir-Knudsen model is also deemed inadequate for high temperature evaporation, while Bird's correction and the Abramzon-Sirignano model are identified as the most relevant for numerical studies of spray combustion systems. Latter is the most elaborate model studied here, as it considers Reynolds number effects beyond the empirical correlation of Ranz and Marshall derived for low-transfer rates. Thus, the Abramzon-Sirignano model is identified as the state of the art alternative in the scope of this study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.