Paper detail

Evaluation of Software Architecture Quality Attribute for an Internet Banking System

The design phase plays a vital role than all other phases in the software development. Software Architecture has to meet both the functional and non-functional quality requirements. The Evaluation of Architecture has to be performed, so that the developers are assured that their selected Architecture will reduce the cost and effort and also enhances the various quality attributes like Availability, Reusability, Performance, Modifiability and Extendibility. The success of the system depends upon the Architecture Evaluation by the essential method to the system. The overall ranking of the candidate architecture is ascertained by assigning weight to the scenario and scenario interaction. In this paper, SAAM method is taken to evaluate the two architectures from the various available method and techniques to achieve the various quality attributes by weight metric.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.