Paper detail

Evaluation of Low-Cost Thermal Laser Stimulation for Data Extraction and Key Readout

Recent attacks using thermal laser stimulation (TLS) have shown that it is possible to extract cryptographic keys from the battery-backed memory on state-of-the-art field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). However, the professional failure analysis microscopes usually employed for these attacks cost in the order of 500k to 1M dollars. In this work, we evaluate the use of a cheaper commercial laser fault injection station retrofitted with a suitable amplifier and light source to enable TLS. We demonstrate that TLS attacks are possible at a hardware cost of around 100k dollars. This constitutes a reduction of the resources required by the attacker by a factor of at least five. We showcase two actual attacks: data extraction from the SRAM memory of a low-power microcontroller and decryption key extraction from a 20-nm technology FPGA device. The strengths and weaknesses of our low-cost approach are then discussed in comparison with the conventional failure analysis equipment approach. In general, this work demonstrates that TLS backside attacks are available at a much lower cost than previously expected.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.