Paper detail

Evaluation of local stress state due to grain-boundary sliding during creep within a crystal plasticity finite element multi-scale framework

Previous studies demonstrate that grain-boundary sliding could accelerate creep rate and give rise to large internal stresses that can lead to damage development, e.g. formation of wedge cracks. The present study provides more insight into the effects of grain-boundary sliding (GBS) on the deformation behaviour of realistic polycrystalline aggregates during creep, through the development of a computational framework which combines: i) the use of interface elements for sliding at grain boundaries, and ii) special triple point (in 2D) or triple line (in 3D) elements to prevent artificial dilation at these locations in the microstructure with iii) a physically-based crystal plasticity constitutive model for time-dependent inelastic deformation of the individual grains. Experimental data at various scales is used to calibrate the framework and compare with model predictions. We pay particular consideration to effects of grain boundary sliding during creep of Type 316 stainless steel, which is used extensively in structural components of the UK fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Nuclear Reactors (AGRs). It is found that the anisotropic deformation of the grains and the mismatch in crystallographic orientation between neighbouring grains play a significant role in determining the extent of sliding on a given boundary. Their effect on the development of stress within the grains, particularly at triple grain junctions, and the increase in axial stress along transverse boundaries are quantified. The article demonstrates that the magnitude of the stress along the facets is highly-dependent on the crystallographic orientations of the neighbouring grains and the relative amount of sliding. Boundaries, transverse to the applied load tend to carry higher normal stresses of the order of 100-180 MPa, in cases where the neighbouring grains consist of plastically-harder crystallographic orientations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.