Paper detail

Evaluation of Cellular Solids Derived from Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces

Cellular solids are a class of materials that have many interesting engineering applications, including ultralight structural materials. The traditional method for analyzing these solids uses convex uniform polyhedral honeycombs to represent the geometry of the material, and this approach has carried over into the design of digital cellular solids. However, the use of such honeycomb-derived lattices makes the problem of decomposing a three-dimensional lattice into a library of two-dimensional parts non-trivial. We introduce a method for generating periodic frameworks from triply periodic minimal surfaces, which result in geometries that are easier to decompose into digital parts. Additionally, we perform finite element modelling of two cellular solids generated from two TPMS, the P- and D-Schwarz, and two cellular solids, the Kelvin and Octet honeycombs. We show that the simulated behavior of these TMPS-derived structures shows the expected modulus of the cellular solid scaling linearly with relative density, which matches the behavior of the highest-coordination honeycomb structure, the octet truss.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.