Paper detail

Evaluating the Maximum Likelihood Method for Detecting Short-Term Variability of AGILE gamma-ray Sources

The AGILE space mission (whose instrument is sensitive in the energy ranges 18-60 keV, and 30 MeV - 50 GeV) has been operating since 2007. Assessing the statistical significance of time variability of gamma-ray sources above 100 MeV is a primary task of the AGILE data analysis. In particular, it is important to check the instrument sensitivity in terms of Poisson modeling of the data background, and to determine the post-trial confidence of detections. The goals of this work are: (i) evaluating the distributions of the likelihood ratio test for "empty" fields, and for regions of the Galactic plane; (ii) calculating the probability of false detection over multiple time intervals. In this paper we describe in detail the techniques used to search for short-term variability in the AGILE gamma-ray source database. We describe the binned maximum likelihood method used for the analysis of AGILE data, and the numerical simulations that support the characterization of the statistical analysis. We apply our method to both Galactic and extra-galactic transients, and provide a few examples. After having checked the reliability of the statistical description tested with the real AGILE data, we obtain the distribution of p-values for blind and specific source searches. We apply our results to the determination of the post-trial statistical significance of detections of transient gamma-ray sources in terms of pre-trial values. The results of our analysis allow a precise determination of the post-trial significance of γ-ray sources detected by AGILE.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.