Paper detail

Evaluating the Impact of Tiled User-Adaptive Real-Time Point Cloud Streaming on VR Remote Communication

Remote communication has rapidly become a part of everyday life in both professional and personal contexts. However, popular video conferencing applications present limitations in terms of quality of communication, immersion and social meaning. VR remote communication applications offer a greater sense of co-presence and mutual sensing of emotions between remote users. Previous research on these applications has shown that realistic point cloud user reconstructions offer better immersion and communication as compared to synthetic user avatars. However, photorealistic point clouds require a large volume of data per frame and are challenging to transmit over bandwidth-limited networks. Recent research has demonstrated significant improvements to perceived quality by optimizing the usage of bandwidth based on the position and orientation of the user's viewport with user-adaptive streaming. In this work, we developed a real-time VR communication application with an adaptation engine that features tiled user-adaptive streaming based on user behaviour. The application also supports traditional network adaptive streaming. The contribution of this work is to evaluate the impact of tiled user-adaptive streaming on quality of communication, visual quality, system performance and task completion in a functional live VR remote communication system. We perform a subjective evaluation with 33 users to compare the different streaming conditions with a neck exercise training task. As a baseline, we use uncompressed streaming requiring ca. 300Mbps and our solution achieves similar visual quality with tiled adaptive streaming at 14Mbps. We also demonstrate statistically significant gains to the quality of interaction and improvements to system performance and CPU consumption with tiled adaptive streaming as compared to the more traditional network adaptive streaming.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.