Paper detail

Evaluating Posterior Distributions by Selectively Breeding Prior Samples

Using Markov chain Monte Carlo to sample from posterior distributions was the key innovation which made Bayesian data analysis practical. Notoriously, however, MCMC is hard to tune, hard to diagnose, and hard to parallelize. This pedagogical note explores variants on a universal {\em non}-Markov-chain Monte Carlo scheme for sampling from posterior distributions. The basic idea is to draw parameter values from the prior distributions, evaluate the likelihood of each draw, and then copy that draw a number of times proportional to its likelihood. The distribution after copying is an approximation to the posterior which becomes exact as the number of initial samples goes to infinity; the convergence of the approximation is easily analyzed, and is uniform over Glivenko-Cantelli classes. While not {\em entirely} practical, the schemes are straightforward to implement (a few lines of R), easily parallelized, and require no rejection, burn-in, convergence diagnostics, or tuning of any control settings. I provide references to the prior art which deals with some of the practical obstacles, at some cost in computational and analytical simplicity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.