Paper detail

Evaluating Feynman Integrals Using D-modules and Tropical Geometry

Feynman integrals play a central role in the modern scattering amplitudes research program. Advancing our methods for evaluating Feynman integrals will, therefore, strengthen our ability to compare theoretical predictions with data from particle accelerators such as the Large Hadron Collider. Motivated by this, the present manuscript purports to study mathematical concepts related to Feynman integrals. In particular, we present both numerical and analytical algorithms for the evaluation of Feynman integrals. The content is divided into three parts. Part I focuses on the method of DEQs for evaluating Feynman integrals. An otherwise daunting integral expression is thereby traded for the comparatively simpler task of solving a system of DEQs. We use this technique to evaluate a family of two-loop Feynman integrals of relevance for dark matter detection. Part II situates the study of DEQs for Feynman integrals within the framework of D-modules, a natural language for studying PDEs algebraically. Special emphasis is put on a particular D-module called the GKZ system, a set of higher-order PDEs that annihilate a generalized version of a Feynman integral. In the course of matching the generalized integral to a Feynman integral proper, we discover an algorithm for evaluating the latter in terms of logarithmic series. Part III develops a numerical integration algorithm. It combines Monte Carlo sampling with tropical geometry, a particular offspring of algebraic geometry that studies "piecewise-linear" polynomials. Feynman's i*epsilon-prescription is incorporated into the algorithm via contour deformation. We present an open-source program named Feyntrop that implements this algorithm, and use it to numerically evaluate Feynman integrals between 1-5 loops and 0-5 legs in physical regions of phase space.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.