Paper detail

Evaluating a Development Framework for Engineering Internet of Things Applications

A critical challenge is to enable IoT application development with minimal effort from various stakeholders involved in the development process. Several approaches to tacking this challenge have been proposed in the fields of wireless sensor networks and ubiquitous and pervasive computing, regarded as precursors to the modern day of IoT. However, although existing approaches provide a wide range of features, stakeholders have specific application development requirements and choosing an appropriate approach requires thorough evaluations on different aspects. To date, this aspect has been investigated to a limited extend. In view of this, this paper provides an extensive set of evaluations based on our previous work on IoT application development framework. Specifically, we evaluate our approach in terms of (1) development effort: the effort required to create a new application, (2) reusability: the extend to which software artifacts can be reused during application development, (3) expressiveness: the characteristics of IoT applications that can be modeled using our approach, (4) memory metrics: the amount of memory and storage a device needs to consume in order to run an application under our framework, and (5) comparison of our approach with state of the art in IoT application development on various dimensions, which does not only provide a comprehensive view of state of the art, but also guides developers in selecting an approach given application requirements in hand. We believe that the above different aspects provide the research community with insight into evaluating, selecting, and developing useful IoT frameworks and applications.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.