Paper detail

Eulerian-Lagrangian modelling of detonative combustion in two-phase gas-droplet mixtures with OpenFOAM: validations and verifications

A hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian solver RYrhoCentralFoam is developed based on OpenFOAM to simulate detonative combustion in two-phase gas-liquid mixtures. For Eulerian gas phase, RYrhoCentralFoam enjoys second order of accuracy in time and space discretizations and is based on finite volume method on polyhedral cells. The following developments are made based on the standard compressible flow solver rhoCentralFoam in OpenFOAM: (1) multi-component species transport, (2) detailed fuel chemistry for gas phase combustion, and (3) Lagrangian solver for gas-droplet two-phase flows and sub-models for liquid droplets. To extensively verify and validate the developments and implementations of the solver and models, a series of benchmark cases are studied, including non-reacting multi-component gaseous flows, purely gaseous detonations, and two-phase gas-droplet mixtures. The results show that the RYrhoCentralFoam solver can accurately predict the flow discontinuities (e.g. shock wave and expansion wave), molecular diffusion, auto-ignition and shock-induced ignition. Also, the RYrhoCentralFoam solver can accurately simulate gaseous detonation propagation for different fuels (e.g. hydrogen and methane), about propagation speed, detonation frontal structures and cell size. Sub-models related to the droplet phase are verified and/or validated against analytical and experimental data. It is also found that the RYrhoCentralFoam solver is able to capture the main quantities and features of the gas-droplet two-phase detonations, including detonation propagation speed, interphase interactions and detonation frontal structures. As our future work, RYrhoCentralFoam solver can also be extended for simulating two-phase detonations in dense droplet sprays.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.