Paper detail

Euclidean ideal classes in Galois number fields of odd prime degree

Weinberger in 1972, proved that the ring of integers of a number field with unit rank at least $1$ is a principal ideal domain if and only if it is a Euclidean domain, provided the generalised Riemann hypothesis holds. Lenstra extended the notion of Euclidean domains in order to capture Dedekind domains with finite cyclic class group and proved an analogous theorem in this setup. More precisely, he showed that the class group of the ring of integers of a number field with unit rank at least $1$ is cyclic if and only if it has a Euclidean ideal class, provided the generalised Riemann hypothesis holds. The aim of this paper is to show the following. Suppose that $\mathbf{K}_1$ and $\mathbf{K}_2$ are two Galois number fields of odd prime degree with cyclic class groups and Hilbert class fields that are abelian over $\mathbb{Q}$. If $\mathbf{K}_1\mathbf{K}_2$ is ramified over $\mathbf{K}_i$, then at least one $\mathbf{K}_i$ ($i \in \{1,2\}$) must have a Euclidean ideal class.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.