Paper detail

Euclidean Frustrated Ribbons

Geometrical frustration in thin sheets is ubiquitous across scales in biology and becomes increasingly relevant in technology. Previous research identified the origin of the frustration as the violation of Gauss's \emph{Theorema Egregium}. Such "Gauss frustration" exhibits rich phenomenology; it may lead to mechanical instabilities, anomalous mechanics and shape-morphing abilities that can be harnessed in engineering systems. Here we report a new type of geometrical frustration, one that is as general as Gauss frustration. We show that its origin is the violation of Mainardi-Codazzi-Peterson compatibility equations and that it appears in Euclidean sheets. Combining experiments, simulations and theory, we study the specific case of a Euclidean ribbon with radial and geodesic curvatures. Experiments, conducted using different materials and techniques, reveal shape transitions, symmetry breaking and spontaneous stress focusing. These observations are quantitatively rationalized using analytic solutions and geometrical arguments. We expect this frustration to play a significant role in natural and engineering systems, specifically in slender 3D printed sheets.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.