Paper detail

Estimation theory and gravity

It is shown that if the Euclidean path integral measure of a minimally coupled free quantum scalar field on a classical metric background is interpreted as probability of observing the field configuration given the background metric then the maximum likelihood estimate of the metric satisfies Euclidean Einstein field equations with the stress-energy tensor of the 'observed' field as the source. In the case of a slowly varying metric the maximum likelihood estimate is very close to its actual value. Then by virtue of the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimate the fluctuations of the metric are Gaussian and governed by the Fisher information bi-tensor. Cramer-Rao bound can be interpreted as uncertainty relations between metric and stress-energy tensor. A plausible prior distribution for the metric fluctuations in a Bayesian framework is introduced. Using this distribution, we calculate the decoherence functional acting on the field by integrating out the metric fluctuations around flat space. Our approach can be interpreted as a formulation of Euclidean version of stochastic gravity in the language of estimation theory.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.