Paper detail

Estimation of the non-linear parameter in Generalised Diversity-Interactions models is unaffected by change in structure of the interaction terms

Research over the past few decades has assumed the richness (number of species) to be the primary driver of the biodiversity and ecosystem function (BEF) relationship. However, biodiversity is multi-dimensional, and richness alone does not capture all its attributes. Diversity-Interactions modelling is a regression-based framework that models the biodiversity and ecosystem function relationship by incorporating species-specific effects along with the interactions between species. The species interactions in a Diversity-Interactions model can take several different forms ranging in complexity from a single interaction term (assuming all pairs of species interact in the same way) to many interaction terms (e.g. assuming a separate interaction for all pairs of species). The specification of the interactions may also include a non-linear parameter (θ) as an exponent to the product of the species proportions to allow for non-linear relationship between the response and species interactions, giving rise to Generalized Diversity-Interactions modelling. The structure of the interaction terms describes the underlying biological processes and thus the selection of a correct structure is important. The inclusion of θ introduces complexity to the model selection process: we could (a) select the interaction structure first by assuming θ=1 and then estimate θ, or (b) estimate θ first and then select the appropriate interaction structure by fixing θ, or (c) test for θ and its inclusion for each interaction structure. It is also unknown whether θ is robust to changes in the underlying interaction structure. Using a simulation study, we test the robustness of θ and compare multiple model selection approaches to identify an optimal and computationally efficient model selection procedure for Generalized Diversity-Interactions models.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.