Paper detail

Estimation of physical conditions in the cold phase of the ISM in the sub-DLA system at z = 2.06 in the spectrum of the quasar J2123-0050

An independent analysis of the molecular hydrogen absorption system at z = 2.059 in the spectrum of the quasar J2123-0050 is presented. The H_2 system consists of two components (A and B) with column densities log N^A(H_2) = 17.94+/-0.01 and log N^B(H_2) = 15.16+/-0.02. The spectrum exhibits the lines of HD molecules (log N^A(HD) = 13.87+/-0.06) and the neutral species C I and Cl I associated with the H_2 absorption system. For the molecular hydrogen lines near the quasar's Ly_beta and O VI emission lines, we detect a nonzero residual flux, ~3% of the total flux, caused by the effect of partial coverage of the quasar's broad-line region by an H_2 cloud. The uniqueness of the system being investigated is manifested in a high abundance of the neutral species H_2 and C I at the lowest H I column density, log N(H I) = 19.18+/-0.15, among the high redshift systems. The N(HD)/2N(H_2) ratio for component A has turned out to be also unusually high, (4.26+/-0.60)x10^{-5}. We have investigated the physical conditions in components A and B. Component A represents the optically thick case; the gas has a low number density (n~30 cm^{-3}) and a temperature T~140 K. In component B, the medium is optically thin with n<100 cm^{-3} and T<100 K. The ultraviolet (UV) background intensity in the clouds exceeds the mean intensity in our Galaxy by almost an order of magnitude. A high gas ionization fraction, n(H+)/n(H)~10^{-2}, which can be the result of partial shielding of the system from hard UV radiation, is needed to describe the high HD and C I column densities. Using our simulations with the PDR Meudon code, we can reconstruct the observed column densities of the species within the model with a constant density n(H)=40 cm^{-3}. A high H_2 formation rate (higher than the mean Galactic value by a factor of 10-40) and high gas ionization fraction and UV background intensity are needed in this case.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.