Paper detail

Estimation of Local Anisotropy Based on Level Sets

Consider an affine Gaussian field X : R 2 $\rightarrow$ R, that is a process equal in law to Z(At), where Z is isotropic and A : R2 $\rightarrow$ R2 is a self-adjoint definite positive matrix. Denote 0 < $λ$ = $λ$\_2 / $λ$\_1 \le 1 the ratio of the eigenvalues of A. This paper is aimed at testing the null hypothesis '' X is isotropic'' versus the alternative '' X is affine''. Roughly speaking, this amounts to testing '' $λ$ = 1 '' versus '' $λ$ < 1 ''. By setting level u in R, this is implemented by the partial observations of process X through some particular level functionals viewed over a square T, which grows to R2. This leads us to provide estimators for the affinity parameters that are shown to be almost surely consistent. Their asymptotic normality provide confidence intervals for parameters. This paper offered an important opportunity to study general level functionals near the level u, part of the difficulties arises from the fact that the topology of level set CT,X (u) = {t $\in$ T : X(t) = u} can be irregular, even if the trajectories of X are regular. A significant part of the paper is dedicated to show the L2-continuity in the level u of these general functionals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.