Paper detail

Estimation of Characteristics of a Software Team for Implementing Effective Inspection Process through Inspection Performance Metric

The continued existence of any software industry depends on its capability to develop nearly zero-defect product, which is achievable through effective defect management. Inspection has proven to be one of the promising techniques of defect management. Introductions of metrics like, Depth of Inspection (DI, a process metric) and Inspection Performance Metric (IPM, a people metric) enable one to have an appropriate measurement of inspection technique. This article elucidates a mathematical approach to estimate the IPM value without depending on shop floor defect count at every time. By applying multiple linear regression models, a set of characteristic coefficients of the team is evaluated. These coefficients are calculated from the empirical projects that are sampled from the teams of product-based and service-based IT industries. A sample of three verification projects indicates a close match between the IPM values obtained from the defect count (IPMdc) and IPM values obtained using the team coefficients using the mathematical model (IPMtc). The IPM values observed onsite and IPM values produced by our model which are strongly matching, support the predictive capability of IPM through team coefficients. Having finalized the value of IPM that a company should achieve for a project, it can tune the inspection influencing parameters to realize the desired quality level of IPM. Evaluation of team coefficients resolves several defect-associated issues, which are related to the management, stakeholders, outsourcing agents and customers. In addition, the coefficient vector will further aid the strategy of PSP and TSP

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.