Paper detail

Estimating the realistic start-up of spontaneous emission in the supercritical QED

The scenario of spontaneous positron emission, caused by the supercritical Coulomb source with charge $Z$ and size $R$, is explored in essentially non-perturbative approach with emphasis on the vacuum energy $\mathcal{E}_{VP}$\footnote{Throughout the paper the abbreviation "VP"\, stands for "vacuum polarization"\,.}, considered as a function of $R$ with fixed $Z>Z_{cr,1}\simeq 170$. It is shown that in the supercritical region the behavior of $\mathcal{E}_{VP}(R)$ turns out to be quite different in dependence on the value of the Coulomb charge $Z$. In particular, spontaneous emission becomes a visible effect starting only from $Z \sim 300$. With further growth of $Z$ its intensity increases very rapidly, which opens up the possibility for unambiguous detection. For such $Z$ the appearing picture of spontaneous emission turns out to be well-established and quite transparent in terms of the resonance decay combined with vacuum shells formation. The intimate, but crucial role of $\mathcal{E}_{VP}(R)$ in the total energy balance in the system is outlined. The additional problems of spontaneous emission, caused by the lepton number conservation, are also discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.