Paper detail

Estimating the outcomes of common envelope evolution in triple stellar systems

We present a new model describing the evolution of triple stars which undergo common envelope evolution, using a combination of analytic and numerical techniques. The early stages of evolution are driven by dynamical friction with the envelope, which causes the outer triple orbit to shrink faster than the inner binary. In most cases, this leads to a chaotic dynamical interaction between the three stars, culminating in the ejection of one of the stars from the triple. This ejection and resulting recoil on the remnant binary are sufficient to eject all three stars from the envelope, which expands and dissipates after the stars have escaped. These results have implications for the properties of post-common envelope triples: they may only exist in cases where the envelope was ejected before the onset of dynamical instability, the likelihood of which depends on the initial binary separation and the envelope structure. In cases where the triple becomes dynamically unstable, the triple does not survive and the envelope dissipates without forming a planetary nebula.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.