Paper detail

Estimating the number of available states for normal and tumor tissues in gene expression space

The topology of gene expression space for a set of 12 cancer types is studied by means of an entropy-like magnitude, which allows the characterization of the regions occupied by tumor and normal samples. The comparison indicates that the number of available states in gene expression space is much greater for tumors than for normal tissues, suggesting the irreversibility of the progression to the tumor phase. The entropy is nearly constant for tumors, whereas exhibits a higher variability in normal tissues, probably due to tissue differentiation. In addition, we show an interesting correlation between the fraction of available states and the overlapping between the tumor and normal sample clouds, interpreted as a way of reducing the decay rate to the tumor phase in more ordered or structured tissues.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.