Paper detail

Estimating the Norms of Random Circulant and Toeplitz Matrices and Their Inverses

We estimate the norms of standard Gaussian random Toeplitz and circulant matrices and their inverses, mostly by means of combining some basic techniques of linear algebra. In the case of circulant matrices we obtain sharp probabilistic estimates, which show that these matrices are expected to be very well conditioned. Our probabilistic estimates for the norms of standard Gaussian random Toeplitz matrices are within a factor of 1.4143 from those in the circulant case. We also achieve partial progress in estimating the norms of Toeplitz inverses. Namely we yield reasonable probabilistic upper estimates for these norms assuming certain bounds on the absolute values of two corner entries of the inverse. Empirically we observe that the condition numbers of random Toeplitz and general matrices tend to be of the same order. As the matrix size grows, these numbers grow equally slowly, although faster than for random circulant matrices.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.