Paper detail

Estimating the longest increasing sequence in polylogarithmic time

Finding the length of the longest increasing subsequence (LIS) is a classic algorithmic problem. Let $n$ denote the size of the array. Simple $O(n\log n)$ algorithms are known for this problem. We develop a polylogarithmic time randomized algorithm that for any constant $δ> 0$, estimates the length of the LIS of an array to within an additive error of $δn$. More precisely, the running time of the algorithm is $(\log n)^c (1/δ)^{O(1/δ)}$ where the exponent $c$ is independent of $δ$. Previously, the best known polylogarithmic time algorithms could only achieve an additive $n/2$ approximation. With a suitable choice of parameters, our algorithm also gives, for any fixed $τ>0$, a multiplicative $(1+τ)$-approximation to the distance to monotonicity $\varepsilon_f$ (the fraction of entries not in the LIS), whose running time is polynomial in $\log(n)$ and $1/varepsilon_f$. The best previously known algorithm could only guarantee an approximation within a factor (arbitrarily close to) 2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.