Paper detail

Estimating the local dark matter density in a non-axisymmetric wobbling disc

The density of dark matter near the Sun is important for experiments hunting for dark matter particles in the laboratory, and for constraining the local shape of the Milky Way's dark matter halo. Estimates to date have typically assumed that the Milky Way's stellar disc is axisymmetric and in a steady-state. Yet the Milky Way disc is neither, exhibiting prominent spiral arms and a bar, and vertical and radial oscillations. We assess the impact of these assumptions on determinations of the local dark matter density by applying a free-form, steady-state, Jeans method to two different N-body simulations of Milky Way-like galaxies. In one, the galaxy has experienced an ancient major merger, similar to the hypothesized Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus; in the other, the galaxy is perturbed more recently by the repeated passage and slow merger of a Sagittarius-like dwarf galaxy. We assess the impact of each of the terms in the Jeans-Poisson equations on our ability to correctly extract the local dark matter density from the simulated data. We find that common approximations employed in the literature - axisymmetry and a locally flat rotation curve - can lead to significant systematic errors of up to a factor ~1.5 in the recovered surface mass density ~2kpc above the disc plane, implying a fractional error on the local dark matter density of order unity. However, once we add in the tilt term and the rotation curve term in our models, we obtain an unbiased estimate, consistent with the true value within our 95% confidence intervals for realistic 20% uncertainties on the baryonic surface density of the disc. Other terms - the axial tilt, 2:nd Poisson and time dependent terms - contribute less than 10% to the local dark matter density (given current data) and can be safely neglected for now. In the future, as more data become available, these terms will need to be included in the analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.