Paper detail

Estimating the impact of recombination uncertainties on the cosmological parameter constraints from cosmic microwave background experiments

[Abridged] We use our most recent training set for the RICO code to estimate the impact of recombination uncertainties on the posterior probability distributions which will be obtained from future CMB experiments, and in particular the Planck satellite. Using a MCMC analysis to sample the posterior distribution of the cosmological parameters, we find that Planck will have biases of -0.7, -0.3 and -0.4 sigmas for n_S, Omega_b h2 and log(As), respectively, in the minimal 6-parameter LCDM model, if the description of the recombination history given by RICO is not used. The remaining parameters are not significantly affected. We also show, that the cosmology dependence of the corrections to the recombination history modeled with RICO has a negligible impact on the posterior distributions obtained for the case of the Planck satellite. In practice, this implies that the inclusion of additional corrections to existing recombination codes can be achieved using simple cosmology-independent `fudge functions'. Finally, we also investigated the impact of some recent improvements in the treatment of hydrogen recombination which are still not included in the current version of our training set for Rico, by assuming that the cosmology dependence of those corrections can be neglected. In summary, with our current understanding of the complete recombination process, the expected biases in the cosmological parameters inferred from Planck might be as large as -2.3, -1.7 and -1 sigmas for n_S, Omega_b h2 and log(As) respectively, if all those corrections are not taken into account. We note that although the list of physical processes that could be of importance for Planck seems to be nearly complete, still some effort has to be put in the validation of the results obtained by the different groups.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.