Paper detail

Estimating the Heights of Martian Vortices from Mars 2020 MEDA Data

Small convective vortices occur ubiquitously on Mars, frequently as dust devils, and they produce detectable signals in meteorological data -- in pressure, temperature, and wind speed and direction. In addition to being important contributors to the martian dust budget, convective vortices may serve as probes of the boundary layer, providing clues on convective instability, boundary layer diurnal evolution, and surface-atmosphere interactions. Using vortices as boundary layer probes requires a detailed understanding of the link between their properties and occurrence rates and the conditions that produce them. Fortunately, the growing cache of data from the Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) instrument suite onboard the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover promises to elucidate these relationships. In this study, we present a catalog of vortex detections from mission sols 90 through 179 to bolster our previous catalog based on sols 15 through 89. Consistent with predictions, we find more vortex encounters during this second half of the mission than from the first half. In addition to analyzing the pressure signals from these vortex encounters, we also use a Gaussian process analysis to recover contemporaneous temperature signals. By combining these signals with a long-established thermodynamics model, we estimate heights of the vortices and find some agreement with previous work and evidence for the diurnal growth and decay of the martian boundary layer. We also discuss prospects for additional boundary layer studies using martian vortex encounters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.